Material Selection and Fiber Orientation Effects in Composite Overwrapped Steel Pipelines: A Numerical Study for Burst Pressure Enhancement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65904/3083-3604.2026.02.05Keywords:
Composite Overwrap, Finite Element Analysis, Fiber Orientation, Burst Pressure, Material Selection, Pipeline RepairAbstract
This study establishes a validated finite element framework for optimizing the burst capacity of petroleum-grade steel pipelines reinforced with composite overwraps. Addressing the limitations of classical netting analysis, the research develops a coupled ANSYS Mechanical and ACP workflow to systematically evaluate the influence of fiber orientation on structural integrity. The methodology first validates the static structural approach against Barlow’s equation using a thin-walled baseline (100 mm diameter, 3 mm wall), yielding a numerical failure pressure of 15.75 MPa against an analytical prediction of 13.8 MPa. Upon validation, the framework is scaled to a production-grade geometry (168.3 mm diameter, 7.1 mm wall) to execute a parametric sweep of winding angles (25 to 90 degrees) across four material systems: Epoxy E-Glass Wet, S-Glass UD, Carbon UD (230 GPa), and Woven Carbon. The results reveal a critical divergence in failure mechanics governed by fiber topology. Unidirectional systems (Carbon, S-Glass, E-Glass) consistently exhibit a "helical advantage," achieving maximum burst pressure at 25 degrees—with Carbon UD peaking at 51.24 MPa—due to superior shear stiffening and axial confinement. Conversely, Woven Carbon displays a unique recovery trend, maximizing performance at 90 degrees (49.15 MPa) where its bidirectional architecture effectively balances hoop stresses. These findings provide a reproducible "angle–performance map" for field engineers, demonstrating that while low-angle helical wraps are optimal for high-modulus tapes, hoop-dominant configurations are required for woven fabrics, thereby refining design guidelines for in-situ pipeline rehabilitation.
References
[1] Chen, J., Wang, H., Salemi, M., & Balaguru, P. N. (2021). Finite element analysis of composite repair for damaged steel pipeline. Coatings, 11(3), 301.
[2] Turai, Y. S., et al. (2022). Finite Element Analysis on Wrapping Structure of Piping System. Research Progress in Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, 2(2), 150-159.
[3] Alexander, C., & Francini, R. (2006). State of the art assessment of composite systems used to repair transmission pipelines. Proceedings of the 6th International Pipeline Conference, Calgary, AB, Canada.
[4] Esmaeel, R. A., & Taheri, F. (2009). Stress analysis of a pressurized pipe repaired with a composite sleeve. Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, 131(6).
[5] Xia, M., Takayanagi, H., & Kemmochi, K. (2001). Analysis of multi-layered filament-wound composite pipes under internal pressure. Composite Structures, 53(4), 483-491.
[6] Soden, P. D., Kitching, R., & Tse, P. C. (1989). Experimental failure stresses for +/- 55 deg filament wound glass fibre reinforced plastic tubes under biaxial loads. Composites, 20(2), 125-135.
[7] Sulaiman, S., Borazjani, S., & Tang, S. H. (2013). Finite element analysis of filament-wound composite pressure vessels under internal pressure. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 50(1).
[8] Soykök, İ. F. (2025). Analytical Evaluation of the Strength in the Repair of Damaged Areas in Steel Pipes with the Composite Hand-Laying Method Using Energy Release Rate Relations. Journal of Dynamics, Energy and Utility, 1(2), 51-59.